|
Stephan Lanz
If you make it in Istanbul you
can make it anywhere
On urbanites and anti-urbanites, village and metropolis (1)
|
|
|
|
|
> click on the photo
|
|
|
|
|
|
> click on the photo
|
|
|
|
|
|
> click on the photo
|
|
|
|
|
|
> click on the photo
|
|
|
|
|
Prestige-project "Bahçeşehir"
(Gardencity),
a gatet community planned for more than
tenthousand inhabitants.
|
|
The city as village
The toughness and individual strength that life in Istanbul demands,
as stated in the interviews, raises the question as to the strategy
with which one attempts to cushion the resulting personal risks.
It suggests itself to do so in an urban society that hardly provides
institutional social safety nets via self-organized social networks.
Three different forms were encountered in the search for them. I
would like to typify these forms based on the stories of Hasan,
who lives in the gecekondu Gazimahallesi, or Gazi, and Hande from
Kuzguncuk, and juxtapose them with analyses of suburban gated communities.
What is unfortunately missing here is the analysis of social networks
of international poverty immigrants and refugees, because they were
not accessible to us (cf. Erder, Tan/Yaghamanian, Bas).
Founded as a gecekondu in 1970, Gazi grew through immigration
from different Anatolian provinces. Especially Alevits, Kurds and
Laz came there, but also Sunnis. Today Gazi is a multicultural quarter
inhabited by various inner-Turkish ethnicities and denominations
who are subject to state repression and social discrimination, like
the Kurds and Alevits. Loosely built-up with one and two-storey
family houses within self-owned gardens, the quarter has retained
its rustic character. Because it has not been legalized until today,
and due to its proximity to the Alibeyköy artificial lake which
belongs to Istanbul's drinking water reservoir, it is threatened
to be demolished by the authorities. But at the same time, electricity
has been provided since 1980, a sewerage system was installed in
1987 and now the municipal refuse collection also offers its services
in the quarter against the usual fees. In 1995 Gazi was in the headlines
of the international press: Shootings from a taxi aimed at Alevits
in cafés, which led to the death of a priest, sparked a two-day
riot between several thousand Alevits and the police, who killed
28 protesters with targeted shots. For the first time since the
coup in 1980 the state of emergency was declared in a city district
of Istanbul, and military forces intervened. Since then a fortress-like
police station is sitting in state on a hill overlooking Gazi, and
even today its armoured personnel carriers patrol the quarter at
night.
Kuzguncuk, on the other hand, is one of those inner-city
areas imbued with the myth of multicultural Istanbul. Situated directly
on the Asian side of the Bosporus, Spanish Jews settled here as
early as the 15th century, followed by Armenians, Greeks and only
much later by Turks. The quarter, in which synagogues and Orthodox
churches are neighbours and a mosque and an Armenian church share
the same piece of property as twin buildings, counted as a cosmopolitan
paradise that lasted for centuries - until, in the wake of the pogroms
in the 1950s, the non-Muslim population left the city. Kuzguncuk
fell into oblivion, the gigantic growth and the modernist redevelopment
of Istanbul hardly had an effect on its substance: In the 1980s,
a number of artists discovered Kuzguncuk as a historical idyll,
as one of the few places bearing witness to the cosmopolitan Istanbul
believed destroyed. Since then, this district reminiscent of a tranquil
small town with ten thousand inhabitants that can be reached in
fifteen minutes from the city centre via the Bosporus ferry has
attracted numerous artists, intellectuals and Western immigrants,
who for the most part bought and refurbished historical building
volumes. Today the quarter accommodates architects' offices, advertising
agencies, galleries, Western-style metropolitan cafés, and
a daily soap.
With Kuzguncuk and Gazimahallesi, then, the symbols
of two Istanbuls contrast each other, the revived cosmopolitan metropolis,
as it were, and the often-hated informal city of immigration. How
does the access to the city differ in both quarters?
In 1988, at 22, Hasan moved with his parents to
Alibeyköy, a gecekondu next to Gazi, not because of
the "enticements of the city" but because they were discriminated
against as Alevits in their hometown of Erzurum. Relatives lived
in Alibeyköy, and there was "collective work with my family".
Thirty years ago his uncle had been one of the founders of the gecekondu
and had meanwhile established an economic existence. Hasan's wife,
whom he met there, is also from Erzurum, but had already arrived
in Istanbul as a child. The couple belonging to a radical left-wing
political group decided to move to Gazi because many Alevits and
their political friends lived there. They purchased an empty gecekondu
from a real-estate agent and refurbished it: "We didn't even
intend to purchase a house of our own, that was not part of our
life plan but was a forced upon us by Turkey. As a tenant, you have
no rights here. A house we own is our only economic security",
they explain. As a member of a "people's council" founded
four years ago in Gazi, Hasan is committed to improving the infrastructure
and taking action against the threat of resettlement, which the
city council has refrained from due to the strongly politicized
residents. "The gecekondus are illegal, but at the same
time, the city collects taxes from them: In Alibeyköy, people
can go to the district administration and pay 2000 euros for a permit
to build a storey. Yet it is not legal. The money is given to the
district administration as a gift, so to speak". Even though
he worked as a meter-reader for the municipal utility company until
recently, he illegally taps the excessively priced electricity.
He simultaneously allowed himself to be bribed by companies also
illegally using electricity via manipulated readers. He justifies
both with the argument that "the electricity illegally used
by such companies corresponds with that of one hundred gecekondus.
I earn about 170 euros a month, of which I spend 100 on driving
to work. The utility company and the state know that the employees
are bribed, because the wage is not high enough to live from".
He recently became unemployed and is now trying to immigrate with
his family to Berlin, where his younger brother already lives as
a student and has a family.
Hande, in contrast, grew up in middle-class Istanbul,
went to a German school and later to Berlin to study. Back in Istanbul
with her German husband, both are self-employed, she looked for
a place to live with her nuclear family and met friends who had
in the meantime moved to Kuzguncuk, a district they were hardly
aware of before. She was attracted to the small-town tranquillity,
the historical built volumes and the image of a polyglot location.
They bought and refurbished an empty, historical residential building.
Its conversion was only possible on account of "connections
to the district administration" and the bribing of officials.
Due to the ongoing gentrification the property prices had already
risen sharply since the mid-1990s: "With this money we could
have afforded a villa in a much nobler quarter, but we like it here.
People know each other, neighbours say hello and look after the
children, and the atmosphere is very special. The local artists,
in particular, contribute to this". The wild urban development
passed by Kuzguncuk without destroying what was old: "It's
a bit like in a village". She can let her children play in
the street here without apprehensions. "Everybody helps each
other": She says there's a neighbourly community of mutual
respect. However, contacts between the intellectuals and the old
inhabitants and immigrants from the Black Sea seem to be limited
to employing them as domestics and being served by them in shops.
Her husband interjects that one lives here only in a scene, like
one is familiar with from Berlin: "It's a bit like [the Berlin
district of] Prenzlauer Berg, [...] it's in tune with our lifestyle".
"You have to be a bit alternative", Hande adds, "to
like it. We know enough people who turn up their noses because of
the dirty streets when walking through the quarter". But she
sends her children to a private school located elsewhere. She says
that the public schools in Kuzguncuk have very few resources at
their disposal and that the many children of the more or less uneducated
residents of the neighbouring gecekondu who attend the school pose
a threat to the quality of education.
Particularly for these middle-class milieus, who
find the streets of Kuzguncuk too dirty, a further form of neighbourly
community-building has offered itself since the 1990s: suburbia
and especially the gated community. Commercial management firms
restrict access to these settlements built according to the American
model. They are fenced in and guarded and lay out a comprehensive
set of rules stipulating the way in which the houses are to be used.
At the same time, they frequently provide hotel-like service packages
and community-building leisure-time offers: "We sell lives
and not houses", is the way a high-ranking manager of Kemer
Country formulated this in the interview. It is one of the most
luxurious settlements located in the northern outskirts of the city,
with 3,000 inhabitants, its own reservoir, a golf-and-country club,
as well as restaurants and shops. While such upper-class communities
with their candy-coloured villas and a spatial structure organized
in dead ends and street loops aesthetically resemble Californian
suburbs, the so-called sites, as gated settlements of flats for
the middle classes, are more reminiscent of South American gated
communities. In terms of their degree of illegality, both hardly
differ from the gecekondus. Often located beyond the city
administration's sphere of responsibility, a village community or,
in case of appropriate connections, the national Ministry of Construction
assists in annulling Istanbul's municipal planning in order to illegally
develop areas that are dedicated to the preservation of ground water
or forests. For example, a highway leading to Kemer Country was
approved by the ministry and co-financed by the developer, although
it was not included in Istanbul's master plan which designates this
area as a preservation zone. At the same time, the developer illegally
sold forest property, which it had only leased, to private parties.
Ayshe Öncü (1997) describes how with the
emergence of colour TV and its series set in American suburbia the
suburban residential building entered into the collective desire
production of the Istanbul middle classes. However, just as important
as the new longing for this Western ideological construction of
the "ideal home" were nostalgic stories of Istanbul, which
one remembered from one's youth as being "green" and "clean",
where one could go fishing and picnic on the shore of the Bosporus.
The middle classes interpreted the hybrid styles of music, language
and fashion that started to spread in the 1980s as "pseudo-urbanity"
and as a "soiling" of their modern Western lifestyle and
they reacted to this with the search for "purity" and
a "clean social environment": "The urban masses also
include politically reviled characters such as the Islamist woman
wearing a 'turban' and the extreme nationalist with his long unkempt
moustache" (Ayata 2002: 28). According to Öncü, the
familiar mixture of social and cultural spaces in Istanbul was perceived
as "culturally polluted" by the middle classes and led
them to seek commodified forms of a homogenous community. The desired
distinction from the provincial, vulgar and uncivilized city crowd
that supposedly does not know how to behave in public space (Öncü
1997: 67ff) is regarded as the central impetus for joining a commercially
organized community of equals defined by practices of consumption.
But since recently some gated communities in Istanbul
also address Islamic politicians and businesspeople, for example,
Hilal, half-moon in English, a newly constructed site for about
500 inhabitants in the Asian part of the city. "Our philosophy
is serenity", says Hilal's manager. The main difference to
other sites is a common room of worship and separate opening hours
of the indoor swimming pool for men and women. "Serenity",
huzur in Turkish, has a more ideological than physical meaning
in this context. It refers to inner peace and cleanliness which,
according to Islamic politics, is attained through faith, or, as
the marketing of Hilal intends in this case, through the purchase
of a part of the site. The Western and Islamic oriented middle classes
seem to share this desire for homogeneity, "cleanliness"
and isolation for which the concept of the gated community stands.
|